Christian & Davis, LLC
864.640.4272 (main) 866.623.4041 (toll-free)

Home
Attorneys
Contact Us
Visit Our Main Site


Subscribe
RSS 2.0 feed
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to Bloglines
Add to Google
Add to your NewsGator
My MSN
What is RSS?



Plaintiff Awarded 8.6 Million Dollar Judgment when Military Doctor Failed to Diagnose Flesh Eating Bacteria

The St. Louis Post - Dispatch recently reported that the former wife of an Air Force Captain won an 8.6 million dollar judgment against the federal government after a military doctor at Scott Air Force Base failed to diagnose a case of flesh eating bacteria in her right arm. She had sought treatment at the base emergency room for pain and swelling in the right arm. The examining doctor felt that she was simply a drug seeking person and advised her to go home and take Motrin. A month later the situation had progressively worsened and she was taken to the emergency room and diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis, a strep infection that decays soft tissue. The federal magistrate ruled that the doctor had failed to timely diagnose and treat the patient and that her arm was virtually destroyed. The Judge ruled that her right arm was withered, lifeless and useless and that she suffered with debilitating pain. It should be noted that the law permits medical malpractice cases against governmental agencies including military doctors and the Veterans Administration organization when the treatment is substandard. Christian & Davis, LLC has experience in handling such cases, including medical malpractice involving hospital emergency rooms.

GOP Clashes Over Medical Malpractice
Posted by: euser
February 10, 2011

House Republicans clashed with one another Wednesday over a longtime GOP priority: limiting medical malpractice damages.

At a Judiciary Committee markup, one GOP lawmaker accused another of proposing legislation that would violate the Constitution.

Republicans had the House read the Constitution as one of their first actions upon winning a majority, and new House rules require lawmakers to provide justification in the Constitution for any bill they propose.

The battle arose over legislation proposed by Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.) that imposes a $250,000 cap on non-economic medical malpractice damages.

Rep. Ted Poe (R-Texas), a former felony court judge and a member of the Congressional Tea Party Caucus, said Gingrey's bill violates the Constitution during a Judiciary Committee markup of the bill.

He also warned he'd vote against the measure if it imposes caps on states that don't want them.

"I got problems with that," Poe said. "I think it's a violation of the Tenth Amendment."

Democrats sparked the fight with an amendment from Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) that would prevent Gingrey's bill from overriding state constitutions that forbid medical malpractice caps. The bill, however, allows states that already have caps in place to retain them.

Johnson agreed to pull his amendment after Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Tenn.) agreed to work with him after Wednesday's mark-up.

Johnson and Rep. Melvin Watts (D-N.C.) baited Republicans by taking them to task for criticizing healthcare reform as a federal intrusion while proposing legislation that overrides state constitutions.

"I think President Reagan would be appalled," Johnson said.

Added Watts: "I thought it was the Republican members of our committee who believe in states' rights."

Smith, who has made tort reform one of his top five priorities, defended the law, saying tort reform falls under the purview of the Constitution's Commerce Clause.

But the accusation of hypocrisy on states' rights clearly stung some Republican members of the panel.

"If Alabama and New York want to be a haven for malpractice suits, it's great for Texas," said Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas). "I'm reticent to allow Congress to impose our will on the states."

By Julian Pecquet - 02/09/11

Permalink

        


Web Resources

Legal links:

Consumer and workers info links:

Governmental links:

Nursing Home links:

Medical Resources:




The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.

Copyright © 2012 by Christian & Davis, LLC. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement.